The Delaware Gazette

Germany decides to abandon nuclear power by 2022

JUERGEN BAETZ

Asso­ci­ated Press

BERLIN — Europe’s eco­nomic pow­er­house, Ger­many, announced plans Mon­day to aban­don nuclear energy over the next 11 years, out­lin­ing an ambi­tious strat­egy in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima dis­as­ter to replace atomic power with renew­able energy sources.

Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel said she hopes the trans­for­ma­tion to more solar, wind and hydro­elec­tric power serves as a roadmap for other countries.

“We believe that we can show those coun­tries who decide to aban­don nuclear power — or not to start using it — how it is pos­si­ble to achieve growth, cre­at­ing jobs and eco­nomic pros­per­ity while shift­ing the energy sup­ply toward renew­able ener­gies,” Merkel said.

Merkel’s gov­ern­ment said it will shut down all 17 nuclear power plants in Ger­many — the world’s fourth-largest econ­omy and Europe’s biggest — by 2022. The gov­ern­ment had no imme­di­ate esti­mate of the transition’s over­all cost.

The plan sets Ger­many apart from most of the other major indus­tri­al­ized nations. Among the other Group of Eight coun­tries, only Italy has aban­doned nuclear power, which was voted down in a ref­er­en­dum after the 1986 Cher­nobyl disaster.

The deci­sion rep­re­sents a remark­able about-face for Merkel’s center-right gov­ern­ment, which only late last year pushed through a plan to extend the life span of the country’s reac­tors, with the last sched­uled to go offline around 2036. But Merkel, who holds a Ph.D. in physics, said indus­tri­al­ized, tech­no­log­i­cally advanced Japan’s “help­less­ness” in the face of the Fukushima dis­as­ter made her rethink the technology’s risks.

Phas­ing out nuclear power within a decade will be a chal­lenge, but it will be fea­si­ble and ulti­mately give Ger­many a com­pet­i­tive advan­tage in the renew­able energy era, Merkel said.

“As the first big indus­tri­al­ized nation, we can achieve such a trans­for­ma­tion toward effi­cient and renew­able ener­gies, with all the oppor­tu­ni­ties that brings for exports, devel­op­ing new tech­nolo­gies and jobs,” Merkel told reporters.

The gov­ern­ment said the renew­able energy sec­tor already employs about 370,000 people.

Germany’s seven old­est reac­tors, already taken off the grid pend­ing safety inspec­tions fol­low­ing the March cat­a­stro­phe at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, will remain offline per­ma­nently, Merkel said. The plants accounted for about 40 per­cent of the country’s nuclear power capacity.

At the time of the Japan­ese dis­as­ter, Ger­many got just under a quar­ter of its elec­tric­ity from nuclear power, about the same share as in the U.S.

While Ger­many already was set to aban­don nuclear energy even­tu­ally, the deci­sion — which still requires par­lia­men­tary approval — dra­mat­i­cally speeds up that process. Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Nor­bert Roettgen said there are no pro­vi­sions that would allow a later pol­icy reverse.

“We don’t only want to renounce nuclear energy by 2022, we also want to reduce our CO2 emis­sions by 40 per­cent and dou­ble our share of renew­able ener­gies, from about 17 per­cent today to then 35 per­cent,” the chan­cel­lor said.

Merkel said the cor­ner­stones of Germany’s energy pol­icy will also include a safe and steady power sup­ply that doesn’t rely on imports, and afford­able prices for indus­try and con­sumers. The plan calls for more invest­ment in nat­ural gas plants as a backup to pre­vent black­outs, the chan­cel­lor said.

Germany’s ini­tia­tive received a skep­ti­cal recep­tion abroad.

French Prime Min­is­ter Fran­cois Fil­lon, whose coun­try relies on nuclear power to pro­duce 80 per­cent of its elec­tric­ity sup­ply, insisted “there’s no way” for the Euro­pean Union to meet its emission-cutting tar­gets with­out at least some nuclear power.

“We respect this deci­sion, but it doesn’t cause us to change our pol­icy,” Fil­lon said. France oper­ates more than one-third of the nuclear reac­tors in the EU.

Sweden’s Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Andreas Carl­gren also crit­i­cized the Ger­man deci­sion, telling The Asso­ci­ated Press that the focus on an end date was unfor­tu­nate and could drive up elec­tric­ity prices across Europe.

Ger­many, usu­ally a net energy exporter, has at times had to import energy since March, with the seven old reac­tors shut and oth­ers tem­porar­ily off the grid for reg­u­lar main­te­nance. Still, the agency over­see­ing its elec­tric­ity grid, DENA, said Fri­day that the coun­try remains self-sufficient and that its renew­able energy pro­duc­tion capac­ity this spring peaked at 28 gigawatts — or about the equiv­a­lent of 28 nuclear reactors.

Many Ger­mans have vehe­mently opposed nuclear power since Cher­nobyl sent radioac­tiv­ity over the coun­try. Tens of thou­sands of peo­ple took to the streets after Fukushima to urge the gov­ern­ment to shut all reac­tors quickly.

A decade ago, a center-left gov­ern­ment drew up a plan to aban­don the tech­nol­ogy for good by 2021 because of its risks. But Merkel’s gov­ern­ment last year amended it to extend the plants’ life­time by an aver­age 12 years — a polit­i­cal lia­bil­ity after Fukushima was hit by Japan’s March 11 earth­quake and tsunami.

Envi­ron­men­tal groups wel­comed Berlin’s decision.

“The coun­try is throw­ing its weight behind clean renew­able energy to power its man­u­fac­tur­ing base and other coun­tries like Britain should take note,” said Robin Oak­ley, Green­peace UK’s cam­paigns director.

Ger­man indus­try said the gov­ern­ment must not allow the pol­icy changes to lead to an unsta­ble power sup­ply or ris­ing elec­tric­ity prices.

Hans-Peter Kei­tel, the pres­i­dent of the Fed­er­a­tion of Ger­man Indus­tries, urged the gov­ern­ment not to set the exit date of 2022 in stone but to be flex­i­ble if prob­lems arise.

Switzer­land, where nuclear power pro­duces 40 per­cent of elec­tric­ity, also announced last week that it plans to shut down its reac­tors grad­u­ally once they reach their aver­age life span of 50 years — which would mean tak­ing the last plant off the grid in 2034.

Germany’s deci­sion broadly fol­lows the con­clu­sions of a government-mandated com­mis­sion on the ethics of nuclear power, which on Sat­ur­day deliv­ered rec­om­men­da­tions on how to abol­ish the technology.

“Fukushima was a dra­matic expe­ri­ence, see­ing there that a high-technology nation can’t cope with such a cat­a­stro­phe,” Matthias Kleiner, the commission’s co-chairman, said Mon­day. “Nuclear power is a tech­nol­ogy with too many inher­ent risks to inflict it on us or our children.”

AP News Posted by on May 30 2011. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2011, Ohio Community Media