The Delaware Gazette

Social Security disability on verge of insolvency


STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

Asso­ci­ated Press

WASHINGTON — Laid-off work­ers and aging baby boomers are flood­ing Social Security’s dis­abil­ity pro­gram with ben­e­fit claims, push­ing the finan­cially strapped sys­tem toward the brink of insolvency.

Appli­ca­tions are up nearly 50 per­cent over a decade ago as peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ties lose their jobs and can’t find new ones in an econ­omy that has shed nearly 7 mil­lion jobs.

The stam­pede for ben­e­fits is adding to a grow­ing back­log of appli­cants — many wait two years or more before their cases are resolved — and wors­en­ing the finan­cial prob­lems of a pro­gram that’s been run­ning in the red for years.

New con­gres­sional esti­mates say the trust fund that sup­ports Social Secu­rity dis­abil­ity will run out of money by 2017, leav­ing the pro­gram unable to pay full ben­e­fits, unless Con­gress acts. About two decades later, Social Security’s much larger retire­ment fund is pro­jected to run dry as well.

Much of the focus in Wash­ing­ton has been on fix­ing Social Security’s retire­ment sys­tem. Pro­pos­als range from rais­ing the retire­ment age to means-testing ben­e­fits for wealthy retirees. But the dis­abil­ity sys­tem is in much worse shape and its prob­lems defy easy solutions.

The trustees who over­see Social Secu­rity are urg­ing Con­gress to shore up the dis­abil­ity sys­tem by real­lo­cat­ing money from the retire­ment pro­gram, just as law­mak­ers did in 1994. That would pro­vide only short-term relief at the expense of weak­en­ing the retire­ment program.

Claims for dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits typ­i­cally increase in a bad econ­omy because many dis­abled peo­ple get laid off and can’t find a new job. This year, about 3.3 mil­lion peo­ple are expected to apply for fed­eral dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits. That’s 700,000 more than in 2008 and 1 mil­lion more than a decade ago.

“It’s pri­mar­ily eco­nomic des­per­a­tion,” Social Secu­rity Com­mis­sioner Michael Astrue said in an inter­view. “Peo­ple on the mar­gins who get bad news in terms of a lay­off and have no other place to go and they take a shot at disability,”

The dis­abil­ity pro­gram is also being hit by an aging pop­u­la­tion — dis­abil­ity rates rise as peo­ple get older — as well as a sys­tem that encour­ages peo­ple to apply for more gen­er­ous dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits rather than wait­ing until they qual­ify for retirement.

Retirees can get full Social Secu­rity ben­e­fits at age 66, a thresh­old grad­u­ally ris­ing to 67. Early retirees can get reduced ben­e­fits at 62. How­ever, if you qual­ify for dis­abil­ity, you can get full ben­e­fits, based on your work his­tory, even before 62.

Also, peo­ple who qual­ify for Social Secu­rity dis­abil­ity auto­mat­i­cally get Medicare after two years, even if they are younger than 65, the age when other retirees qual­ify for the government-run health insur­ance program.

Con­gress tried to rein in the dis­abil­ity pro­gram in the late 1970s by mak­ing it tougher to qual­ify. The num­ber of peo­ple receiv­ing ben­e­fits declined for a few years, even dur­ing a reces­sion in the early 1980s. Con­gress, how­ever, reversed course and loos­ened the cri­te­ria, and the rolls were grow­ing again by 1984.

The dis­abil­ity pro­gram “got into trou­ble first because of lib­er­al­iza­tion of eli­gi­bil­ity stan­dards in the 1980s,” said Charles Bla­hous, one of the pub­lic trustees who over­see Social Secu­rity. “Then it got another shove into big­ger trou­ble dur­ing the recent recession.”

Today, about 13.6 mil­lion peo­ple receive dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits through Social Secu­rity or Sup­ple­men­tal Secu­rity Income. Social Secu­rity is for peo­ple with sub­stan­tial work his­to­ries, and monthly dis­abil­ity pay­ments aver­age $927. Sup­ple­men­tal Secu­rity Income does not require a work his­tory but it has strict lim­its on income and assets. Monthly SSI pay­ments aver­age $500.

As pol­i­cy­mak­ers work to improve the dis­abil­ity sys­tem, they are faced with two major issues: Legit­i­mate appli­cants often have to wait years to get ben­e­fits while many oth­ers get pay­ments they don’t deserve.

Last year, Social Secu­rity detected $1.4 bil­lion in over­pay­ments to dis­abil­ity ben­e­fi­cia­ries, mostly to peo­ple who got jobs and no longer qual­i­fied, accord­ing to a recent report by the Gov­ern­ment Account­abil­ity Office, the inves­tiga­tive arm of Congress.

Con­gress is tar­get­ing overpayments.

The deficit reduc­tion pack­age enacted this month would allow Con­gress to boost Social Security’s bud­get by about $4 bil­lion over the next decade to invest in pro­grams that iden­tify peo­ple who no longer qual­ify for dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits. The Con­gres­sional Bud­get Office esti­mates that increased enforce­ment would save nearly $12 bil­lion over the next decade.

At the same time, the appli­ca­tion process can be a night­mare for legit­i­mate appli­cants. About two-thirds of ini­tial appli­ca­tions are rejected. Most of these peo­ple drop their claims, but for those will­ing go through an appeals process that can take two years or more, chances are good they even­tu­ally will get benefits.

Astrue has pledged to reduce pro­cess­ing times for appli­cants’ appeals, and he has had some suc­cess, even as the num­ber of claims sky­rock­ets. The num­ber of peo­ple wait­ing for deci­sions has increased, but their wait times are going down.

“It’s ludi­crous to say that the back­log prob­lem is get­ting worse,” Astrue said. “The back­log prob­lem has got­ten dra­mat­i­cally better.”

Patri­cia L. Fos­ter said she was work­ing as a nurse in a hos­pi­tal in Colum­bia, S.C., in 2005 when she was attacked by a patient who was suf­fer­ing from a men­tal ill­ness. Fos­ter, 64, said she injured her neck so bad she had a plate inserted. She said she also suf­fers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Fos­ter was turned down twice for Social Secu­rity dis­abil­ity ben­e­fits before finally get­ting them in 2009, after hir­ing an Illinois-based com­pany, All­sup, to rep­re­sent her. She said she was awarded retroac­tive ben­e­fits, though the process was demeaning.

“I have to tell you, when you’re told you can­not return to nurs­ing because of your dis­abil­ity, you don’t know how long I cried about that,” Fos­ter said. “And then Social Secu­rity says, ‘Oh no, you don’t qual­ify.’ You don’t know what that does to you emo­tion­ally. You have no idea.”

AP News Posted by on Aug 21 2011. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2011, Ohio Community Media