The Delaware Gazette

Army: Some Arlington markers may need replacement

MATTHEW BARAKAT

Asso­ci­ated Press

ARLINGTON, Va. — Thou­sands of grave mark­ers at Arling­ton National Ceme­tery may need to be replaced or added to accu­rately account for the dead, fol­low­ing a metic­u­lous Army review of each of the nearly 260,000 head­stones and niche cov­ers on the grounds.

In a report to Con­gress on Thurs­day, the Army found poten­tial dis­crep­an­cies between head­stones and ceme­tery paper­work on about 64,000 grave mark­ers — about one in four.

Con­gress ordered the review last year fol­low­ing reports of misiden­ti­fied and mis­placed graves that led to the ouster of the cemetery’s top executives.

The report found no fur­ther evi­dence of mis­placed graves, though it cau­tioned that its review is not com­plete and that some errors could have gone undetected.

There are poten­tially thou­sands of minor errors, includ­ing mis­spelled names, or incor­rect mil­i­tary ranks and dates of birth and death.

The Army com­pared infor­ma­tion on every head­stone to its inter­nal records, scour­ing hand­writ­ten logs of the dead from the Civil War and a hodge­podge of other records to ver­ify accuracy.

In an inter­view, the cemetery’s exec­u­tive direc­tor, Kathryn Con­don, said reviews are ongo­ing and it’s pre­ma­ture to try to esti­mate exactly how many head­stones may need replacement.

To be sure, many of the 64,000 dis­crep­an­cies will turn up no prob­lem with a head­stone — it may be as sim­ple as a typo on an inter­nal record. And in many cases, the dis­crep­an­cies are not errors at all but reflect past prac­tices at the ceme­tery that are now con­sid­ered outdated.

One of the biggest sur­prises uncov­ered by the review was that in most of the early 20th cen­tury, the ceme­tery did not include the name of a wife on a head­stone when she was buried next to her hus­band. Under cur­rent prac­tices, the name of the spouse is etched onto the back of the headstone.

Con­don said the ceme­tery will cor­rect that by adding the spouse’s name to the gravesite. She said it is not only the right thing to do but is also required by law.

Account­ing for the for­got­ten spouses alone will require thou­sands of cor­rec­tions, offi­cials said. In some cases, replace­ment head­stones will be made. In cases where the head­stones are con­sid­ered his­toric, foot­stones will be added.

The Army and a team of 70 ana­lysts are under­tak­ing painstak­ing reviews of every case where they find a poten­tial dis­crep­ancy to ensure that records are made accu­rate. Those reviews are expected to be com­pleted in the summer.

The process began with a hand count, using sim­ple mechan­i­cal click­ers, of every gravesite — 259,978 to be exact. (More than 300,000 peo­ple are buried at Arling­ton, but some grave mark­ers have two or more names.) Then, dur­ing the sum­mer, mem­bers of the Army’s cer­e­mo­nial Old Guard unit used iPhones to pho­to­graph the front and back of every head­stone, so the infor­ma­tion could be com­pared against inter­nal records.

Offi­cials cited Chris­t­ian Keiner, a Civil War vet­eran from New York who died in 1919, as a typ­i­cal exam­ple. The head­stone reflected only his name, but inter­nal records showed that his wife, Car­o­line Keiner, had also been buried there in 1915. In addi­tion, the inter­nal records spelled Car­o­line Keiner’s name as “Kiner.” Offi­cials reviewed hand­writ­ten Cen­sus records from 1900 and Civil war-era mil­i­tary and pen­sion records to con­firm that “Keiner” was indeed the cor­rect spelling.

John Schrader, co-chair of the Gravesite Account­abil­ity Task Force, said record­keep­ing meth­ods var­ied widely over the cemetery’s 147-year his­tory, from hand­writ­ten logs to index cards, to type­writ­ten forms and two dif­fer­ent com­puter data­bases. That some­times com­pounded prob­lems, as tran­scrip­tion errors were com­mon. To avoid those prob­lems, all of the old records have been scanned and dig­i­tized, rather than tran­scribed, to avoid intro­duc­ing fur­ther errors, he said.

The sheer size of the ceme­tery also made the task dif­fi­cult. It is the second-largest ceme­tery in the coun­try as well as a tourist site that draws more than 4 mil­lion vis­i­tors a year, all while con­duct­ing nearly 30 buri­als a day, some with full mil­i­tary honors.

The most sig­nif­i­cant part of the review, Con­don said, is that the ceme­tery for the first time has a sin­gle, reli­able data­base that will allow offi­cials to fix past mis­takes and plan for the future.

The ceme­tery is cur­rently test­ing an inter­ac­tive, web-based ver­sion of its data­base that will allow vis­i­tors to click on a dig­i­tal map to see gravesites and learn who is buried there, ensur­ing the cemetery’s records are open and acces­si­ble going forward.

“We’ll have 300 mil­lion Amer­i­can fact-checkers,” Schrader said.

AP News Posted by on Dec 22 2011. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2011, Ohio Community Media