The Delaware Gazette

NTSB recommends ban on driver cellphone use

JOAN LOWY

Asso­ci­ated Press

WASHINGTON — States should ban all dri­ver use of cell­phones and other portable elec­tronic devices, except in emer­gen­cies, the National Trans­porta­tion Board said Tuesday.

The rec­om­men­da­tion, unan­i­mously agreed to by the five-member board, applies to both hands-free and hand-held phones and sig­nif­i­cantly exceeds any exist­ing state laws restrict­ing tex­ting and cell­phone use behind the wheel.

The board made the rec­om­men­da­tion in con­nec­tion with a deadly high­way pileup in Mis­souri last year. The board said the ini­tial col­li­sion in the acci­dent near Gray Sum­mit, Mo., was caused by the inat­ten­tion of a 19 year-old-pickup dri­ver who sent or received 11 texts in the 11 min­utes imme­di­ately before the crash.

The pickup, trav­el­ing at 55 mph, col­lided into the back of a trac­tor truck that had slowed for high­way con­struc­tion. The pickup was rear-ended by a school bus that over­rode the smaller vehi­cle. A sec­ond school bus rammed into the back of the first bus.

The pickup dri­ver and a 15-year-old stu­dent on one of the school buses were killed. Thirty-eight other peo­ple were injured in the Aug. 5, 2010, acci­dent near Gray Sum­mit, Mo.

About 50 stu­dents, mostly mem­bers of a high school band from St. James, Mo., were on the buses head­ing to the Six Flags St. Louis amuse­ment park.

The acci­dent is a “big red flag for all dri­vers,” NTSB chair­man Deb­o­rah Hers­man said at a meet­ing to deter­mine the cause of the acci­dent and make safety recommendations.

It’s not pos­si­ble to know from cell phone records if the dri­ver was typ­ing, reach­ing for the phone or read­ing a text at the time of the crash, but it’s clear he was man­u­ally, cog­ni­tively and visu­ally dis­tracted, she said.

“Dri­ving was not his only pri­or­ity,” Hers­man said. “No call, no text, no update is worth a human life.”

The board is expected to rec­om­mend new restric­tions on dri­ver use of elec­tronic devices behind the wheel. While the NTSB doesn’t have the power to impose restric­tions, it’s rec­om­men­da­tions carry sig­nif­i­cant weight with fed­eral reg­u­la­tors and con­gres­sional and state lawmakers.

Mis­souri had a law ban­ning dri­vers under 21 years old from tex­ting while dri­ving at the time of the crash, but wasn’t aggres­sively enforc­ing the ban, board mem­ber Robert Sumwalt said.

“With­out the enforce­ment, the laws don’t mean a whole lot,” he said.

Inves­ti­ga­tors are see­ing tex­ting, cell phone calls and other dis­tract­ing behav­ior by oper­a­tors in acci­dents across all modes of trans­porta­tion with increas­ing fre­quency. It has become rou­tine for inves­ti­ga­tors to imme­di­ately request the preser­va­tion of cell phone and tex­ting records when they launch an investigation.

In the last few years the board has inves­ti­gated a com­muter rail acci­dent that killed 25 peo­ple in Cal­i­for­nia in which the train engi­neer was tex­ting; a fatal marine acci­dent in Philadel­phia in which a tug­boat pilot was talk­ing on his cell­phone and using a lap­top; and a North­west Air­lines flight that flew more than 100 miles past its des­ti­na­tion because both pilots were work­ing on their laptops.

The board has pre­vi­ously rec­om­mended bans on tex­ting and cell phone use by com­mer­cial truck and bus dri­vers and begin­ning dri­vers, but it has stopped short of call­ing for a ban on the use of the devices by adults behind the wheel of pas­sen­ger cars.

The prob­lem of tex­ting while dri­ving is get­ting worse despite a rush by states to ban the prac­tice, Trans­porta­tion Sec­re­tary Ray LaHood said last week. In Novem­ber, Penn­syl­va­nia became the 35th state to for­bid tex­ting while driving.

About two out of 10 Amer­i­can dri­vers over­all — and half of dri­vers between 21 and 24 — say they’ve thumbed mes­sages or emailed from the driver’s seat, accord­ing to a sur­vey of more than 6,000 dri­vers by the National High­way Traf­fic Safety Administration.

And what’s more, many dri­vers don’t think it’s dan­ger­ous when they do it — only when oth­ers do, the sur­vey found.

At any given moment last year on America’s streets and high­ways, nearly 1 in every 100 car dri­vers was tex­ting, email­ing, surf­ing the Web or oth­er­wise using a hand­held elec­tronic device, the safety admin­is­tra­tion said. And those activ­i­ties spiked 50 per­cent over the pre­vi­ous year.

The agency takes an annual snap­shot of dri­vers’ behav­ior behind the wheel by stak­ing out inter­sec­tions to count peo­ple using cell­phones and other devices, as well as other dis­tract­ing behavior.

Dri­ver dis­trac­tion wasn’t the only sig­nif­i­cant safety prob­lem uncov­ered by NTSB’s inves­ti­ga­tion of the Mis­souri acci­dent. Inves­ti­ga­tors said they believe the pickup dri­ver was suf­fer­ing from fatigue that may have eroded his judg­ment at the time of the acci­dent. He had an aver­age of about five and a half hours of sleep a night in the days lead­ing up to the acci­dent and had had fewer than five hours of sleep the night before the acci­dent, they said.

The pickup dri­ver had no his­tory of acci­dents or traf­fic vio­la­tions, inves­ti­ga­tors said.

Inves­ti­ga­tors also found sig­nif­i­cant prob­lems with the brakes of both school buses involved in the acci­dent. A third school bus sent to a hos­pi­tal after the acci­dent to pick up stu­dents crashed in the hos­pi­tal park­ing lot when that bus’ brakes failed.

How­ever, the brake prob­lems didn’t cause or con­tribute to the sever­ity of the acci­dent, inves­ti­ga­tors said.

Another issue involved the dif­fi­culty pas­sen­gers had exit­ing the first school bus after the acci­dent. The bus’ front and rear bus doors were unus­able after the acci­dent — the front door because the front bus was on top of the trac­tor truck cab and too high off the ground, and the rear door because the front of the bus had intruded five feet into the rear of the first bus.

Pas­sen­gers had to exit through an emer­gency win­dow, but the raised latch on the win­dow kept catch­ing on cloth­ing as stu­dents tried to escape, inves­ti­ga­tors said. Exit­ing was fur­ther slowed because the win­dow design required one per­son to hold the win­dow up in order for a sec­ond per­son to crawl through, they said.

It was crit­i­cal for pas­sen­gers to exit as quickly as pos­si­ble because a large amount of fuel pud­dled under­neath the bus was a seri­ous fire haz­ard, inves­ti­ga­tors said.

“It could have been a much worse sit­u­a­tion if there was a fire,” Don­ald Karol, the NTSB’s high­way safety direc­tor, said.

AP News Posted by on Dec 13 2011. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2011, Ohio Community Media