The Delaware Gazette

Economic developments lead to cautious optimism

Look­ing into the future is always fraught with dan­ger given the mul­ti­tude of known influ­ences that need to be con­sid­ered, not to men­tion those fac­tors that are unknown at the time a fore­cast is pro­duced. For exam­ple, how could any­one have guessed that a Japan­ese tsunami would roil mar­kets last year or that an uncom­monly mild win­ter would pre­vail in the U.S. this year while many parts of Europe dig out from under record snowfalls?

As mat­ters cur­rently stand, it seems as though the U.S. econ­omy is plod­ding along on a favor­able growth path; one that is almost cer­tainly sub­stan­dard, but prob­a­bly one that is allow­ing a par­tial heal­ing of our nation’s labor mar­kets. Gen­er­ally in 2012, the num­ber of ini­tial claims for unem­ploy­ment insur­ance has been on the decline, with the weekly fig­ures track­ing well below the crit­i­cal thresh­old of 400,000 new claimants. While much — per­haps too much — has been made about how num­bers below 400,000 mean that job cre­ation has accel­er­ated, it is unde­ni­ably good news that the num­ber of newly unem­ployed indi­vid­u­als is falling.

To be sure, one fac­tor that may be dis­tort­ing the strength of some labor mar­ket data is the very mild win­ter and the influ­ence this could have on the “sea­sonal adjust­ment” process. In most years, as the weather turns nasty in Jan­u­ary and Feb­ru­ary, the num­ber of ini­tial claims rises and many jobs are lost, such as in the con­struc­tion, trans­porta­tion, and retail sec­tors. But since such influ­ences occur vir­tu­ally every year, the gov­ern­ment can extract sea­sonal influ­ences through the sea­sonal adjust­ment process by knock­ing down the ini­tial claims num­bers (and bump­ing up the employ­ment fig­ures) so as to adjust data that more fully reflect the under­ly­ing trends with­out the impact of sea­sonal influences.

Dur­ing 2012, how­ever, the mild weather likely means fewer ini­tial claims for unem­ploy­ment insur­ance and more jobs avail­able than is typ­i­cal. If this sce­nario seems rea­son­able — keep­ing in mind the warn­ing above about the nature of eco­nomic fore­cast­ing — then the fig­ures for Jan­u­ary and Feb­ru­ary may be mis­lead­ingly strong. Of course, if this hap­pens, sta­tis­ti­cal pay­back may take place in March and April. After all, you can’t gain back what you never lost due to mild weather, thus the jobs nor­mally cre­ated in spring due to sea­sonal influ­ences are absent and make the “sea­son­ally adjusted” data for those months appear uncom­fort­ably weak. When aver­aged together, how­ever, these first four months or so of 2012 will likely show decent jobs growth, amount­ing to some 1.75–2.0 mil­lion new jobs for the year. To deter­mine if this belief has some valid­ity to it, Fri­day will see the release of the Feb­ru­ary labor mar­ket reports, which should be rea­son­ably strong, with approx­i­mately 200,000 pay­roll jobs cre­ated and the unem­ploy­ment rate chang­ing lit­tle from Jan­u­ary (8.3 percent).

Despite this gen­er­ally good labor mar­ket news, there are cer­tainly some rea­sons for con­cern, and thus only “cau­tious” opti­mism about eco­nomic devel­op­ments. Last week, for exam­ple, Jan­u­ary data for per­sonal income and spend­ing of Amer­i­cans were released and the results were not encour­ag­ing. While per­sonal income rose by a respectable 0.3 per­cent com­pared to Decem­ber, after adjust­ing for taxes and infla­tion, dis­pos­able income fell by 0.1 per­cent. And for the third month in a row, the inflation-adjusted spend­ing of U.S. con­sumers was flat, sug­gest­ing growth in the first quar­ter will be below the 3.0 per­cent growth pace set dur­ing the final three months of 2011.

Lower eco­nomic growth is also present in a num­ber of other coun­tries, most notably in Europe and China. In the case of Europe, the 17 nation euro-zone saw its col­lec­tive GDP fall by 0.3 per­cent in the fourth quar­ter of last year com­pared to the prior quar­ter. While it is far from cer­tain, this could well indi­cate that the euro-zone has fallen into reces­sion, which will likely reduce their pur­chase of U.S. goods and ser­vices and slow our own econ­omy as the year progresses.

As well the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment has just reduced the esti­mate of their own eco­nomic growth antic­i­pated in 2012 to “only” 7.5 per­cent. While this may well remain the best growth rate in the world, it is a sig­nif­i­cant slow­down from growth rates of 10 per­cent plus for the past sev­eral years. And as with Europe, the Chi­nese slow­down will place some lim­its on just how much U.S. exports can expand (say, in the agri­cul­tural sec­tor) and allow our econ­omy to prosper.

Or so the tea leaves presently suggest.

Dr. James New­ton serves as chief eco­nomic advi­sor to Com­merce National Bank and is an aux­il­iary fac­ulty mem­ber in eco­nom­ics and sta­tis­tics at OSU-Marion and OSU-Newark. Dr. Newton’s views do not nec­es­sar­ily reflect those of Com­merce National Bank or OSU-Marion/Newark.

Jim Newton Posted by on Mar 7 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media