The Delaware Gazette

Bernanke: Fed could act again to stimulate economy

Fed­eral Reserve Chair­man Ben Bernanke lis­tens to a ques­tion dur­ing a news con­fer­ence at the Fed­eral Reserve in Wash­ing­ton, Wednes­day, April 25, 2012. The news con­fer­ence fol­lowed the Fed­eral Open Mar­ket Com­mit­tee meet­ing pre­sent­ing the FOMC’s cur­rent eco­nomic pro­jec­tions. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

MARTIN CRUTSINGER

AP Eco­nom­ics Writer

WASHINGTON — Con­tent for now with the cur­rent course, Fed­eral Reserve Chair­man Ben Bernanke left open the pos­si­bil­ity Wednes­day that the Fed will take fur­ther action to stim­u­late the econ­omy and reduce unem­ploy­ment — but not at the cost of high inflation.

He spoke to reporters after Fed pol­i­cy­mak­ers ended a two-day meet­ing by stick­ing to their plan to keep inter­est rates near zero through at least late 2014. The offi­cials said the econ­omy is grow­ing mod­er­ately and that the pace will likely pick up.

But they also cau­tioned that unem­ploy­ment won’t fall sharply any­time soon and that risks from Europe’s debt cri­sis remain. In a state­ment, they noted that infla­tion has risen, mainly because of gaso­line prices, and they expect the spike to be temporary.

Since the finan­cial cri­sis, the Fed has pur­sued two rounds of bond pur­chases to try to push down long-term inter­est rates, with a goal of encour­ag­ing bor­row­ing and spending.

Bernanke told reporters that more bond pur­chases, or other steps by the Fed, are still an option if the econ­omy weakens.

“Those tools remain very much on the table,” Bernanke said.

The deci­sion to leave Fed pol­icy unchanged had been widely expected, and reac­tion in finan­cial mar­kets was muted. The yield on the 10-year Trea­sury note edged higher, and the dol­lar rose slightly against other cur­ren­cies. Stock indexes didn’t move much.

David Jones, chief econ­o­mist at DMJ Advi­sors, said he thinks the Fed will keep another round of bond buy­ing as an option through the rest of this year. But with the econ­omy slowly improv­ing, Jones said, the Fed is unlikely to imple­ment such a pro­gram this year.

Crit­ics have expressed con­cerns that the cen­tral bank has raised the risk of higher infla­tion with its long-running cam­paign to keep rates low.

In a recent opin­ion piece in For­tune mag­a­zine, She­lia Bair, for­mer chair­man of the Fed­eral Deposit Insur­ance Corp., argued that the cen­tral bank might be cre­at­ing a bond mar­ket bub­ble sim­i­lar to the hous­ing bubble.

The “Fed should declare vic­tory and not inter­vene” by mak­ing fur­ther pur­chases of bonds, Bair said.

Asked about this crit­i­cism, Bernanke coun­tered it’s “a lit­tle pre­ma­ture to declare vic­tory” in the Fed’s drive to stim­u­late the econ­omy and lower unem­ploy­ment. Bernanke has fre­quently pointed to the chron­i­cally weak hous­ing mar­ket and the more than 5 mil­lion Amer­i­cans who have been unem­ployed for more than six months.

At the same time, Bernanke sought to show that he is mind­ful of the risks of high infla­tion. He said the Fed would shape its pol­icy to keep infla­tion no higher than its tar­get of 2 per­cent over the long term.

The Fed’s deci­sion to keep its cur­rent easy-credit stance was approved on a 9–1 vote of the cen­tral bank’s pol­icy com­mit­tee, com­posed of Fed board mem­bers in Wash­ing­ton and five regional bank presidents.

As he has at the past two meet­ings, Jef­frey Lacker, pres­i­dent of the Rich­mond Fed, opposed the late-2014 tar­get date. The state­ment said Lacker didn’t think eco­nomic con­di­tions war­rant a record low rate late for that long.

After their pol­icy meet­ing in Jan­u­ary, Bernanke and his col­leagues hinted that they were edg­ing closer to a third round of bond buy­ing. But since then, signs have sug­gested that the U.S. econ­omy has strengthened.

The Fed first set its late-2014 tar­get at the Jan­u­ary meet­ing. That tar­get date rep­re­sented a move from last August when it announced a mid-2013 tar­get for the first Fed rate move.

The Fed’s bench­mark funds rate has been kept near zero since Decem­ber 2008. That means con­sumer and busi­ness loans tied to that rate have also remained at super-low lev­els. The lower those loan rates, the more likely peo­ple and com­pa­nies are to bor­row and spend and invig­o­rate the economy.

After its bond-buying pro­grams expired, the Fed in Sep­tem­ber began a $400 bil­lion pro­gram dubbed Oper­a­tion Twist. Under that pro­gram, the Fed is not expand­ing its port­fo­lio but instead sell­ing shorter-term secu­ri­ties it owns and buy­ing longer-term bonds to keep their rates down. The pro­gram is sched­uled to end in June.

On Fri­day, the gov­ern­ment will issue its first esti­mate of eco­nomic growth for the January-March quar­ter. Many econ­o­mists are pre­dict­ing an annual growth rate of 2.5 per­cent — bet­ter than they had expected when the year began.

But ana­lysts are con­cerned that growth could weaken in the cur­rent quar­ter, reflect­ing pay­back from an unusu­ally warm win­ter that boosted eco­nomic activ­ity in the first quarter.

In its updated fore­cast Wednes­day, the Fed pre­dicted that the econ­omy will grow between 2.4 per­cent and 2.9 per­cent in 2012 — slightly faster than it pre­dicted after its Jan­u­ary pol­icy meet­ing. How­ever, the Fed is fore­cast­ing slower growth in 2013 and 2014. Bernanke attrib­uted those fore­casts in part to the expi­ra­tion of tax cuts and to spend­ing cuts enacted by Congress.

The Fed thinks unem­ploy­ment, now at a three-year low of 8.2 per­cent, will be between 7.8 per­cent and 8 per­cent at year’s end, also slightly bet­ter than its pre­vi­ous forecast.

The Fed has slightly raised its esti­mate for infla­tion by year’s end: between 1.9 per­cent and 2 per­cent. Still, that higher fore­cast is still lower than the Fed’s offi­cial 2 per­cent infla­tion target.

On inter­est rates, 11 Fed offi­cials are fore­cast­ing that the first inter­est rate hike won’t occur until 2014 or later. But no offi­cial is look­ing for the first rate hike to occur as late as 2016. After their Jan­u­ary pol­icy meet­ing, two Fed offi­cials had put the first rate hike that far out.

AP News Posted by on Apr 25 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media