The Delaware Gazette

GOP ignores veto threat, passes student loan bill

ALAN FRAM

Asso­ci­ated Press

WASHINGTON — Repub­li­cans ignored a veto threat and over­came a rebel­lion by party con­ser­v­a­tives to push a bill through the House Fri­day keep­ing inter­est rates on mil­lions of fed­eral stu­dent loans from dou­bling this summer.

Law­mak­ers voted 215–195 to approve a bill that has become an election-year bat­tle between the two par­ties over help­ing fam­i­lies in a per­sis­tently ail­ing econ­omy. The mea­sure sparked debate over women’s health issues, too.

The White House and most Democ­rats opposed the $5.9 bil­lion bill because of how Repub­li­cans cov­ered the costs: elim­i­nat­ing a pre­ven­tive health care fund in Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s health care law. They say the pro­gram mostly ben­e­fits women, while Repub­li­cans call it a loosely con­trolled slush fund.

“This is a polit­i­cally moti­vated pro­posal and not the seri­ous response that the prob­lem fac­ing America’s col­lege stu­dents deserves,” the White House wrote in a veto mes­sage shortly before the House vote.

Democ­rats accused Repub­li­cans of sup­port­ing the effort to keep stu­dent loan inter­est rates low only because of polit­i­cal pres­sure from Obama.

The House mea­sure is des­tined to die in the Sen­ate, where major­ity Democ­rats have writ­ten a ver­sion of the bill paid for by rais­ing Social Secu­rity and Medicare pay­roll taxes on high-income own­ers of some pri­vately owned com­pa­nies, which GOP sen­a­tors oppose.

GOP law­mak­ers were pres­sured by con­ser­v­a­tive groups like the Club for Growth to oppose the leg­is­la­tion because, they said, the gov­ern­ment should not sub­si­dize stu­dent loans. In the end, 30 Repub­li­cans voted no, while 202 voted yes.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Democ­rats had invented a Repub­li­can war on women for polit­i­cal gain.

“To pick this big polit­i­cal fight where there is no fight is just silly. Give me a break,” he said, win­ning a rau­cous stand­ing ova­tion from GOP lawmakers.

On the Demo­c­ra­tic side, party lead­ers pres­sured rank-and-file law­mak­ers to oppose the Repub­li­can mea­sure. Some Democ­rats wanted to vote to keep stu­dent loan rates low, though it meant accept­ing GOP health care cuts.

In the end, 165 Democ­rats opposed the bill, and 13 voted for it.

The House bill would keep inter­est rates for sub­si­dized Stafford loans at 3.4 per­cent for another year. With­out con­gres­sional action, they would rise auto­mat­i­cally to 6.8 per­cent on July 1, a con­di­tion set in a law Democ­rats pushed through Con­gress five years ago.

Repub­li­cans noted that many Democ­rats had voted ear­lier this year to take money from the pre­ven­tive health fund to help keep doc­tors’ Medicare reim­burse­ments from drop­ping. Obama’s own bud­get in Feb­ru­ary pro­posed cut­ting $4 bil­lion from the same fund to pay for some of his priorities.

Friday’s vote came with con­gres­sional Repub­li­cans and Democ­rats, as well as Obama and his near-certain GOP oppo­nent this fall, Mitt Rom­ney, com­pet­ing at every turn over who has the best pre­scrip­tion to wring new jobs out of the still-struggling econ­omy. The stu­dent loan bat­tle fits nicely into that theme, with 7.4 mil­lion low– and middle-income stu­dents and their par­ents reliant on Stafford loans and a col­lege edu­ca­tion sym­bol­iz­ing the ticket to eco­nomic success.

The vote also fol­lowed days of campaign-style road trips that Obama used to get in front of the issue and por­tray Repub­li­cans as foot-draggers on it. The week began with Rom­ney say­ing he favored keep­ing loan rates low, remarks he hoped would pre­vent Obama from mak­ing the mat­ter a cam­paign fight but which may have helped prod con­gres­sional Repub­li­cans into action.

Democ­rats noted that Repub­li­cans pre­vi­ously had ques­tioned the wis­dom of keep­ing stu­dents’ inter­est rates low. They also accused Repub­li­cans of revers­ing them­selves, after vot­ing ear­lier this month for a 2013 fed­eral bud­get that let Stafford loan rates dou­ble as scheduled.

For House Minor­ity Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the empha­sis was the GOP’s cuts in the pre­ven­tive health pro­gram, whose ini­tia­tives she said include breast can­cer screen­ing and children’s immu­niza­tions. She con­trasted that with a Demo­c­ra­tic bill extend­ing the low stu­dent rates by cut­ting sub­si­dies to oil and nat­ural gas com­pa­nies, which is opposed by the GOP.

Pelosi char­ac­ter­ized the Repub­li­can view as, “‘We pre­fer tax sub­si­dies for big oil rather than the health of America’s women.’”

The higher inter­est rates, if trig­gered, would affect the 7.4 mil­lion under­grad­u­ates expected to bor­row new Stafford loans begin­ning July 1. This year, 8 mil­lion stu­dents took out such loans, aver­ag­ing $3,568, accord­ing to the Edu­ca­tion Department.

AP News Posted by on Apr 27 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media