The Delaware Gazette

Do you agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act?

Do you agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s deci­sion to uphold the Afford­able Care Act?

View Results

Loading ...Loading …
Weekly Poll Posted by on Jun 28 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

7 Comments for “Do you agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act?”

  1. Any­one who is self insured in this coun­try is one major ill­ness (can­cer, for exam­ple) away from finan­cial ruin. Try to get insur­ance after a diag­no­sis of can­cer — any type. The indi­vid­ual man­date is as nec­es­sary as car insur­ance. It pro­tects not just the indi­vid­ual but all of the rest of us — when the unin­sured present at the emer­gency room WE ARE THE ONES WHO PICK UP THE TAB. This is not rocket sci­ence, folk. There is no such thing as free med­ical care (except maybe for the mil­i­tary). If we could with­hold emer­gency med­ical care from peo­ple short sighted enough not to buy insur­ance i’d think twice about the man­date — but we can’t, alas. So get on board — the man­date is to pro­tect the rest of us. Enough rub­bish about Big Brother gov­ern­ment — the US is going down the tubes eaten up by inef­fi­cient and fear­fully expen­sive med­ical care — the Afford­able Health Care Act is an effort to address this crit­i­cal prob­lem. Other coun­ties do it — surely we can’t be last in everything??

  2. JRH

    It is clear we need to do some­thing about health­care as a coun­try. The costs are ridicu­lous. If you want to wit­ness the need for help, attend the Grace Med­ical Clinic at Andrews house on Wednes­day and see how many peo­ple come. Our coun­try loses pro­duc­tiv­ity every day due to peo­ple who can’t afford health care.

    Why do hos­pi­tals and insur­ance com­pa­nies spend mil­lions of dol­lars on adver­tis­ing and huge salaries for exec­u­tives when there are so many peo­ple who need care? To keep their wal­lets fat and their lux­ury homes. They sure don’t seem to care much about the Amer­i­can peo­ple they are sup­posed to serve.

    Do we really want to con­tinue on this road to entrench­ing a huge divide between the haves and have nots? We are march­ing on a path back to the times when the aris­to­crats con­trolled coun­tries and all the com­mon­ers lived mea­ger lives only dream­ing of bet­ter days. Those are the days that brought my ances­tors to Amer­ica from Europe to escape con­scrip­tion and a class sys­tem with lit­tle hope of upward mobility.

  3. John

    Plain & sim­ple — thou­sands of US cit­i­zens die every year because they don’t get decent health care because they are unin­sured and can’t afford it. “Oba­macare” is a sin­cere attempt to get insur­ance cov­er­age for mil­lions of unin­sured Amer­i­cans. So they can get med­ical care. So they can get well. So they can live.

  4. Fred

    Get ready, Obama is going to choke the life out of the Amer­i­can taxpayer.

    • Iwould not expect any­thing less from any and all REPUGS of del.county i hope i see the day u go to the hosp.and are turned away for no insurence.

    • Janice Confer

      The Indi­vid­ual Man­date is the right thing to do morally and eco­nom­i­cally.
      See John’s com­ments for the moral rea­sons.
      Eco­nomic rea­sons:
      (1)The aver­age U.S. fam­ily and employ­ees pay more than $1,000 a year to com­pen­sate for the unin­sured. (USA Today)
      (2)The more peo­ple in the sys­tem, the lower the pre­mium will be. This
      is already hap­pen­ing due to the parts of the act which are in effect which
      accept pre­vi­ously unin­sured groups.
      (3) Unin­sured per­sons put off going to the doc­tor until a seri­ous ill­ness devel­ops. This puts them at risk and costs the tax­pay­ers.
      (4) Only a small per­cent­age of indi­vid­u­als, those who can afford it,
      will be asked to pay a tax for not buy­ing insur­ance.
      For answers, go to : healthcare.gov/law/full/iindex.html
      For a non-government source, go to factcheck.org and ask questions.

    • Dear Fred, please read my com­ment — you are preach­ing the Rush Lim­burgh line with­out thought to the real costs of insured Americans.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media