The Delaware Gazette

Malware deadline passes, very few knocked offline

Norton’s Inter­net Secu­rity 2012 soft­ware for com­puter secu­rity on dis­play at Best Buy in Moun­tain View, Calif., Fri­day. Despite repeated alerts, tens of thou­sands of Amer­i­cans may lose their Inter­net ser­vice Mon­day unless they do a quick check of their com­put­ers for mal­ware that could have taken over their machines more than a year ago. The warn­ings about the Inter­net prob­lem have been splashed across Face­book and Google. Inter­net ser­vice providers have sent notices, and the FBI set up a spe­cial web­site. (Asso­ci­ated Press | Paul Sakuma)

BARBARA ORTUTAY

LOLITA C. BALDOR

Asso­ci­ated Press

WASHINGTON — If you’re read­ing this online, you’re fine. The day that was sup­posed to see thou­sands of peo­ple knocked off the Inter­net has arrived, but only a few peo­ple were affected.

Thou­sands of Inter­net users across the U.S. and beyond waited too long or sim­ply didn’t believe warn­ings that they would lose access to the Inter­net just after mid­night because of mal­ware that took over com­put­ers around the world more than a year ago.

At 12:01 a.m. on Mon­day, the FBI turned off Inter­net servers that were func­tion­ing as a tem­po­rary safety net to keep infected com­put­ers online for the past eight months. A court order the agency had got­ten to keep the servers run­ning expired, and was not renewed.

FBI offi­cials have been track­ing the num­ber of com­put­ers they believe still may be infected by the mal­ware. As of Sun­day night, there were about 41,800 in the U.S., down from 45,600 on July 4. World­wide, the total is roughly 211,000 infected. An esti­mated 2.3 bil­lion peo­ple around the world use the Inter­net, accord­ing to Inter­net World Stats.

Con­sid­er­ing that there are mil­lions of Inter­net users across the coun­try, sev­eral thou­sand los­ing access isn’t a big deal — unless you are one of them.

As the dead­line approached, Inter­net ser­vice providers such as AT&T Inc. and Time Warner Cable Inc. set up their own safety nets to allow the affected com­put­ers to con­tinue to access the Internet.

AT&T said only a “small per­cent­age” of its cus­tomers were affected by the virus. To make sure they can con­tinue to access the Inter­net, the com­pany will main­tain legit­i­mate Inter­net servers for them through the end of the year.

This, said spokesman Mark Siegel, gives peo­ple “ade­quate time” to remove the virus from their com­put­ers and avoid ser­vice interruption.

Time Warner Cable would not say how many of its cus­tomers were affected by the virus, but spokesman Justin Venech said the com­pany also set up its own servers to ensure they can get online. Time Warner has no spe­cific dead­line, but the com­pany will notify peo­ple who are affected so they can fix their computers.

Ver­i­zon Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Inc. said it will “con­tinue to pro­vide extended sup­port to our cus­tomers dur­ing the month of July — while con­tin­u­ing to instruct them on the nec­es­sary actions they must take to resolve the issue on their computers.”

The com­pany added that it has noti­fied affected cus­tomers “using a vari­ety of meth­ods, includ­ing email, phone calls, and postal mail correspondence.”

In South Korea, there were no reports from affected com­put­ers Mon­day. As many as 80 com­put­ers there are believed to be infected with the mal­ware that may cause prob­lems in Web surf­ing, down from 1,798 com­put­ers in Feb­ru­ary, accord­ing to the government.

“The impact will be lim­ited,” said Lee Sang-hun, head of net­work secu­rity at the Korea Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Com­mis­sion, a gov­ern­ment body. The gov­ern­ment and pri­vate broad­band providers opened helplines and issued warn­ings. They also asked users to check if their com­put­ers were infected and to down­load antivirus soft­ware. South Korea is one of the most wired coun­tries in the world, with more than 90 per­cent of house­holds con­nected to broad­band Internet.

The prob­lem began when inter­na­tional hack­ers ran an online adver­tis­ing scam to take con­trol of more than 570,000 infected com­put­ers around the world. When the FBI went in to take down the hack­ers late last year, agents real­ized that if they turned off the mali­cious servers being used to con­trol the com­put­ers, all the vic­tims would lose their Inter­net service.

In a highly unusual move, the FBI set up the safety net. They brought in a pri­vate com­pany to install two clean Inter­net servers to take over for the mali­cious servers so that peo­ple would not sud­denly lose their Internet.

And they arranged for a pri­vate com­pany to run a web­site, http://www.dcwg.org, to help com­puter users deter­mine whether their com­puter was infected and find links to other com­puter secu­rity busi­ness sites where they could find fixes for the problem.

From the onset, most vic­tims didn’t even know their com­put­ers had been infected, although the mali­cious soft­ware prob­a­bly slowed their web surf­ing and dis­abled their antivirus soft­ware, mak­ing their machines more vul­ner­a­ble to other problems.

Efforts to solve the issue have been hin­dered a bit by a few fac­tors: Many com­puter users don’t fully under­stand how their com­put­ers work. The cyber world of viruses, mal­ware, bank fraud and Inter­net scams is often dis­tant and con­fus­ing, and warn­ing mes­sages may go unseen or unheeded.

And other peo­ple sim­ply don’t trust the gov­ern­ment, and believe that fed­eral author­i­ties are only try­ing to spy on them, or take over the Inter­net, by push­ing solu­tions to the infec­tion. Blogs and other Inter­net forums are rid­dled with post­ings warn­ing of the gov­ern­ment using the mal­ware as a ploy to breach Amer­i­can cit­i­zens’ com­put­ers — a charge the FBI and other secu­rity experts famil­iar with the mal­ware quickly denounced as ridiculous.

There is an under­ly­ing sense that this has been much ado about noth­ing — like the hoopla over Y2K, when the tran­si­tion to the year 2000 pre­sented tech­ni­cal prob­lems and fears that some com­put­ers would stop work­ing because they were not set up for the date change. In the end, as in this case, there were very few problems.

Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I., who co-founded the cyber­se­cu­rity cau­cus in Con­gress, said com­puter users have a respon­si­bil­ity to prac­tice good hygiene and make sure their com­put­ers have not been infected or hijacked by criminals.

“These types of issues are only going to increase as our soci­ety relies more and more on the Inter­net, so it is a reminder that every­one can do their part,” he said.

Chester Wis­niewski, senior secu­rity adviser at com­puter secu­rity firm Sophos, said it would have been bet­ter to turn off the safety net ear­lier, so that peo­ple can clean up their computers.

“There is only so much respon­si­bil­ity the Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment has to con­tinue to run this stuff,” he said. “If you still have this virus it’s likely that you have others.”

AP News Posted by on Jul 9 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media