The Delaware Gazette

Obama, Romney clash on economy in first debate

Repub­li­can pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee Mitt Rom­ney and Pres­i­dent Barack Obama wave to the audi­ence dur­ing the first pres­i­den­tial debate Wednes­day at the Uni­ver­sity of Den­ver. (Asso­ci­ated Press | Char­lie Neibergall)

DAVID ESPO

JULIE PACE

Asso­ci­ated Press

DENVER — In a show­down at close quar­ters, Pres­i­dent Barack Obama and Repub­li­can Mitt Rom­ney sparred aggres­sively in their first cam­paign debate Wednes­day night over taxes, deficits and strong steps needed to cre­ate jobs in a sput­ter­ing national econ­omy. “The sta­tus quo is not going to cut it,” declared the challenger.

Obama in turn accused his rival of seek­ing to “dou­ble down” on eco­nomic poli­cies that actu­ally led to the dev­as­tat­ing national down­turn four years ago.

Both men made fre­quent ref­er­ences to the weak econ­omy and high national unem­ploy­ment, by far the dom­i­nant issue in the race for the White House. Pub­lic opin­ion polls show Obama with a slight advan­tage in key bat­tle­ground states and nation­ally, and Rom­ney was par­tic­u­larly aggres­sive, like a man look­ing to shake up the cam­paign with a lit­tle less than five weeks to run.

Polite but pointed, the two men agreed about lit­tle if anything.

Obama said his opponent’s plan to reduce all tax rates by 20 per­cent would cost $5 tril­lion and ben­e­fit the wealthy at the expense of mid­dle income taxpayers.

Shot back Rom­ney: “Vir­tu­ally every­thing he just said about my tax plan is inaccurate.”

The for­mer Mass­a­chu­setts gov­er­nor and busi­ness­man added that Obama’s pro­posal to allow the expi­ra­tion of tax cuts on upper-level income would mean tax increases on small busi­nesses that cre­ate jobs by the hun­dreds of thousands.

The two cam­paign rivals clasped hands and smiled as they strode onto the debate stage at the Uni­ver­sity of Den­ver, then waved to the audi­ence before tak­ing their places behind iden­ti­cal lecterns.

There was a quick moment of laugh­ter, when Obama referred to first lady Michelle Obama as “sweetie” and noted it was their 20th anniversary.

Rom­ney added best wishes, and said to the first cou­ple, “I’m sure this is the most roman­tic place you could imag­ine, here with me.”

Both can­di­dates’ wives were in the audience.

The two men debated before a tele­vi­sion audi­ence likely to be counted in the tens of mil­lions. They will meet twice more this month, and their run­ning mates once, but in past elec­tion years, view­er­ship has some­times fallen off after the first encounter.

With­out say­ing so, the two rivals quickly got to the crux of their race — Romney’s eager­ness to turn the con­test into a ref­er­en­dum on the past four years while the incum­bent desires for vot­ers to choose between his plan for the next four years and the one his rival backs.

Rom­ney ticked off the dreary eco­nomic facts of life — a sharp spike in food stamps, eco­nomic growth “lower this year than last” and “23 mil­lion peo­ple out of work or stropped look­ing for work.”

But Obama crit­i­cized Romney’s pre­scrip­tions and his refusal to raise taxes and said, “if you take such an unbal­anced approach then that means you are going to be gut­ting our invest­ment in schools and edu­ca­tion … health care for seniors in nurs­ing homes (and) for kids with disabilities.”

Not sur­pris­ingly, the two men dis­agreed over Medicare, a flash point since Rom­ney placed Wis­con­sin Rep. Paul Ryan on his ticket.

The pres­i­dent repeat­edly described Romney’s plan as a “voucher pro­gram” that would raise out-of-pocket costs on seniors.

He con­tin­ued, directly address­ing the vot­ers at home: “If you’re 54 or 55 you might want to lis­ten because this will affect you.”

Rom­ney said he doesn’t sup­port any changes for cur­rent retirees or those close to retirement.

“If you’re 60 or 60 and older you don’t need to lis­ten fur­ther,” he said, but he con­tended that fun­da­men­tal changes are needed to pre­vent the sys­tem from becom­ing insol­vent as mil­lions of baby boom gen­er­a­tion Amer­i­cans become eligible.

Rom­ney also made a detailed case for repeal­ing Oba­macare, the name attached to the health care plan that Obama pushed through Con­gress in 2010. “It has killed jobs,” he said, and argued that the best approach is to “do what we did in my state.”

Though he didn’t say so, when he was gov­er­nor Mass­a­chu­setts passed leg­is­la­tion that required res­i­dents to pur­chase cov­er­age — the so-called indi­vid­ual man­date that con­ser­v­a­tives and he oppose on a national level.

Rom­ney also said that Oba­macare would cut $716 bil­lion from Medicare over the next decade.

The pres­i­dent said the changes were part of a plan to lengthen the program’s life, and he added that AARP, the seniors lobby, sup­ports it.

Jim Lehrer of PBS drew moderator’s duties, with Obama get­ting the first ques­tion and Rom­ney the last word.

Five weeks before Elec­tion Day, early vot­ing is under way in scat­tered states and begin­ning in more every day. Opin­ion polls show Obama with an advan­tage nation­ally and in most if not all of the bat­tle­ground states where the race is most likely to be decided.

That put par­tic­u­lar pres­sure on Rom­ney to come up with a show­ing strong enough to alter the course of the campaign.

The sput­ter­ing econ­omy served as the debate back­drop, as it has for vir­tu­ally every­thing else in the 2012 cam­paign for the White House. Obama took office in the shadow of an eco­nomic cri­sis but promised a turn­around that hasn’t mate­ri­al­ized. Eco­nomic growth has been slug­gish through­out his term, with unem­ploy­ment above 8 per­cent since before he took office.

The cus­tom­ary secu­rity blended with a festival-like atmos­phere in the sur­round­ing area on a warm and sunny day. The Lum­i­neers per­formed for free, and Black Eyed Peas front­man will.i.am deliv­ered a pep talk of sorts to Obama’s sup­port­ers. School offi­cials arranged to show the debate on mon­i­tors out­side the hall for those with­out tickets.

There was local polit­i­cal the­ater, too, includ­ing female Rom­ney sup­port­ers wear­ing short shorts and hold­ing signs that said, “What War On Women?” — a rebut­tal to claims by Obama and the Democrats.

Both cam­paigns engaged in a vig­or­ous pre-debate com­pe­ti­tion to set expec­ta­tions, each side sug­gest­ing the other had built-in advantages.

Rom­ney took part in 19 debates dur­ing the cam­paign for the Repub­li­can pri­mary early in the year. The pres­i­dent has not been onstage with a polit­i­cal oppo­nent since his last face-to-face encounter with Ari­zona Sen. John McCain, his Repub­li­can rival in 2008.

Obama and Rom­ney pre­pared for the evening with lengthy prac­tice ses­sions. Rom­ney selected Ohio Sen. Rob Port­man as a stand-in for the pres­i­dent; Obama turned to Mass­a­chu­setts Sen. John Kerry to play the Repub­li­can role.

The two pres­i­den­tial rivals also are sched­uled to debate on Oct. 16 in Hemp­stead, N.Y., and Oct. 22 in Boca Raton, Fla.

Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden and Repub­li­can Rep. Paul Ryan of Wis­con­sin have one debate, Oct. 11 in Danville, Ky. Both men have already begun hold­ing prac­tice sessions.

AP News Posted by on Oct 3 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Comments can be made below.

Leave a Reply

 

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M - F 8am to 5pm | 740-363-1161 | 40 N. Sandusky Street, Suite 202, Delaware, OH 43015

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media