May 7, 2012
WASHINGTON — The Senate weighed on Monday whether to punish China for undervaluing its currency and taking away American jobs. At issue is whether legislation would boost the American economy, as its supporters argue, or initiate a damaging trade war with a major partner.
The bill has bipartisan backing and on a 79-19 vote easily achieved the 60 votes needed to move it to the Senate floor. Still, the legislation faces considerable hurdles before it becomes law. The Obama White House, while agreeing that China’s yuan is undervalued, has been wary of unilateral sanctions against the Beijing government. Major U.S. business groups share those misgivings and House Republican leaders have shown no interest in bringing it to a vote.
The currency bill gives congressional Democrats an opportunity to show they remain tough on unfair trade practices. The Senate took up the bill on the same day the White House sent to Congress free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that some Democrats see as threats to U.S. jobs.
The Senate bill, which does not specifically mention China, sets in motion a process for imposing punitive tariffs against a country with misaligned currencies. The bill also makes it easier for specific industries to seek higher tariffs on foreign competitors when undervalued currencies become a means to subsidize exports.
Supporters of the bill say that, despite some incremental adjustments by Beijing over the past year, the value of the yuan is still as much as 40 percent below what it should be, keeping the prices of Chinese goods artificially low and U.S. products excessively high. They say that is a major factor in a trade deficit with China that hit $273 billion last year.
Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer, who has been sponsoring currency legislation for the past six years, said China’s “predatory currency practices” were “undermining the economic health of American manufacturers and their ability to compete at home and around the globe.”
It is time, said Democratic Sen. Bob Casey, to “let the officials in China know that there are consequences to cheating.”
Said Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid on Monday: “This legislation will even the playing field and help American goods compete in a global market, and keep American jobs here at home.”
The Fair Currency Coalition, a group that supports the bill, gives the example of how a Chinese customer wanting to buy a $20,000 U.S. car would have to pay almost 140,000 yuan at the current exchange rate. But if the rate reflected market values, that car would cost only about 80,000 yuan, making it much more affordable.
Robert Scott of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute said that with a 28.5 percent revaluation the price of a Boeing 737, about $57 million in dollars, would fall from the current 363.7 million yuan to 259.3 million yuan. “This would greatly increase the competitiveness of U.S. aircraft both in China and in world export markets.”
The consequences of imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods are hard to predict. Bill supporters say it would make American goods more competitive and point to a study by Scott that appreciating the yuan by 28.5 percent would create up to 2.25 million jobs and cut the U.S. annual trade deficit by $190.5 billion.
Doug Guthrie, dean of the George Washington University School of Business, argues however that the legislation would do little to put Americans back to work and could saddle consumers with higher-priced Chinese goods.
He said it was difficult to see how any currency adjustment would close the wage gap between Chinese and American workers and that most economists predict that American importers would simply switch from China to other low-wage countries such as Vietnam or Indonesia. Moreover, big sellers of Chinese goods such as Wal-Mart are heavily investing in the Chinese market, and are not likely to stop buying from Chinese factories.
“Wal-Mart is so deeply embedded in China that there is no way” they will leave, and the end result will be higher prices for American consumers, he said.
Another concern is that China would retaliate by boosting tariffs on U.S. products. China’s official Xinhua News Agency, in a commentary, said the Senate bill was “a publicity attempt to attract voters and distract attention from the real problems facing the U.S. economy.” It added that “trade conflict always leads to bilateral damage.”
The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, agrees that China needs to appreciate its currency but has cautioned against unilateral action that could generate a trade war.
The Senate vote coincides with a trip to Beijing by Treasury Undersecretary Lael Brainard. Treasury said in a statement that Brainard would tell the Chinese that while the yuan “has appreciated 10 percent adjusted for inflation since June 2010, the currency remains substantially undervalued, and more progress is needed.”
The House in September 2010, voted 348-79 for a more narrow China currency bill, but the top two Republicans, current Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor were against it and do not appear inclined to bring up the issue if it should pass the Senate.
Asked about it at a news conference Monday, Cantor replied only that he was “curious, really, as to where the White House is on that.” He said he wanted to find out if there were any “unintended consequences” from the measure.